This is a really basic derivation of elementary facts about rings, just for the record. I follow Milne's definition of a ring (R, +, 0, -, ⋅ 1) as a commutative group (R, +, 0, -) equipped with an additional operation ⋅ and a distinguished 1 ∈ R such that (R, ⋅, 1) is a monoid, and ⋅ distributes over + both on the left and on the right: for all a, b, c ∈ R
(a + b)⋅c = a⋅c + b⋅c a⋅(b + c) = a⋅b + a⋅c
Lemma for any a, b ∈ R, a⋅0 = 0 = 0⋅b
a⋅0 = 0
⇐ { Cancellation on the left }
a⋅b + a⋅0 = a⋅b + 0
≡ { Distributivity on the right }
a⋅(b + 0) = a⋅b + 0
≡ { Group neutral, twice }
a⋅b = a⋅b
≡
true
The other direction is analogous:
0⋅b = 0
⇐ { Cancellation on the right }
0⋅b + a⋅b = 0 + a⋅b
≡ { Distributivity on the right }
(0 + a)⋅b = 0 + a⋅b
≡ { Group neutral, twice }
a⋅b = a⋅b
≡
true
Theorem for any a, b ∈ R, (-a)⋅b = -(a⋅b) = a⋅(-b)
(-a)⋅b = -(a⋅b)
⇐ { Cancellation on the right }
(-a)⋅b + a⋅b = -(a⋅b) + a⋅b
≡ { Distributivity on the right, group inverse }
(-a + a)⋅b = 0
≡ { Group inverse }
0⋅b = 0
≡ { Lemma }
true
The other direction is analogous:
a⋅(-b) = -(a⋅b)
⇐ { Cancellation on the left }
a⋅b + a⋅(-b) = a⋅b + -(a⋅b)
≡ { Distributivity on the left, group inverse }
a⋅(b + -b) = 0
≡ { Group inverse }
a⋅0 = 0
≡ { Lemma }
true
Also, the following is immediate:
Theorem If 1 = 0, then R = {0}
Proof: note that, for arbitrary a, b ∈ R:
a
= { Definition }
a⋅1
= { Hypothesis }
a⋅0
= { Lemma }
0
= { Lemma }
0⋅b
= { Hypothesis }
1⋅b
= { Definition }
b
which shows that there is at most one element in R.
2 comments:
I am curious to know how you typeset these proofs. Did you format them by hand?
@Frank: yes, I write the HTML by hand on a text editor. If you inspect the stylesheet you'll see a section marked "/* Modifications */" with the classes I use to format equations, code, etc. The crucial bit is to have the displayed block be preformatted but use the proportional font for the rest of the page.
Post a Comment